🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.